<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>ITechTips</title>
      <link>http://www.itechtips.com/</link>
      <description>Information Technology - A discussion on hardware, software, security, management, integration, budgeting, obsolescence, outsourcing, communication, etc. as it relates to information technology.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:06:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.34</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Shell Outsourcing IT</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I understand that this is probably old news, but I just finished reading the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.shell.com/home/content/media-en/news_and_library/press_releases/2008/signing_master_service_agreement_31032008.html">press release</a> from&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.shell.com/">Royal Dutch Shell plc</a> (<span>NYSE:&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=RDS-B">RDS-B</a>) </span>regarding their efforts to outsource a significant part of its IT infrastructure &amp; telecommunications services to AT&amp;T, T-Systems and EDS.&nbsp; I find that&nbsp;I need to vent a little bit as this will impact approximately 3,000 IT staff worldwide:<img vspace="10" align="right" width="150" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/shell_logo-thumb.jpg" hspace="10" alt="shell_logo.jpg" height="139" style="width: 150px; height: 139px" title="shell_logo.jpg" /></p><blockquote><p>&quot;The move is part of the company&#39;s initiative to achieve top quartile performance in its businesses and functions in support of its &quot;More Upstream, Profitable Downstream&quot; strategy. </p><p>As well as significant improvements in efficiency and productivity, the initiative will deliver important financial benefits for Shell over the first five years.&nbsp; Over the same period, the total value of the Agreements to the three suppliers will be in excess of $4.0 billion.&quot;</p></blockquote><p>While they expect to transfer the majority of their IT staff to the service providers, there will assuredly be a reduction in headcount...there always is.</p>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/04/shell_outsourcing_it.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/04/shell_outsourcing_it.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/04/shell_outsourcing_it.html</guid>
<category>Business</category><category>Offshoring</category><category>Outsourcing</category><category>Service Provider</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:06:59 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>ScaleMP&apos;s vSMP Foundation Standalone Software</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the month-long hiatus, but I&#39;m back at it again.&nbsp; I ran across an interesting <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/01/scalemp_four_socket/">post</a> on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/">The Register</a> that described a software solution from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.scalemp.com/">ScaleMP</a> that will allow a customer to link two dual-socket x86 servers via <a target="_blank" href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid5_gci214596,00.html">InfiniBand</a> and have them behave as if they were a single four-socket server.<img vspace="10" align="right" width="150" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/vSMPFS-thumb.gif" hspace="10" alt="vSMPFS.gif" height="87" style="width: 150px; height: 87px" title="vSMPFS.gif" /></p><p>Why not just buy a single four-socket server you ask?&nbsp; Well, according to ScaleMP there are two compelling reasons:</p><ul><li>Two dual-socket servers are less expensive &quot;to purchase&quot; than a four-socket server (TCO aside...).</li><li>Hardware vendors have a tendency to introduce more advanced and faster processors in their dual-socket servers first.</li></ul>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/04/scalemps_vsmp_foundation_stand.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/04/scalemps_vsmp_foundation_stand.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/04/scalemps_vsmp_foundation_stand.html</guid>
<category>Software</category><category>Data Center</category><category>server consolidation</category><category>server virtualization</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:19:13 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Threat Thursday:  What&apos;s The Internet Weather Like?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As usual, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/">The Register</a> is a regular fount of knowledge when it comes to all things IT.&nbsp; I was reading an article and learned that the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sans.org/">SANS (SysAdmin, Audit, Network, Security) Institute</a>, reportedly one of the largest sources for information security training and certification in the world, also maintains a site called the Internet Storm Center (ISC):<img vspace="10" align="right" width="150" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/isc-thumb.jpg" hspace="10" alt="isc.jpg" height="91" style="width: 150px; height: 91px" title="isc.jpg" /></p><blockquote><p>&quot;The <a target="_blank" href="http://isc.sans.org/">ISC</a> was created in 2001 following the successful detection, analysis, and widespread warning of the Li0n worm.&nbsp; Today, the ISC provides a free analysis and warning service to thousands of Internet users and organizations, and is actively working with Internet Service Providers to fight back against the most malicious attackers.&quot;</p></blockquote>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/threat_thursday_whats_the_inte.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/threat_thursday_whats_the_inte.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/threat_thursday_whats_the_inte.html</guid>
<category>Security</category><category>Hacker</category><category>Internet</category><category>Threat</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:24:20 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Daylight Savings Time, Part Deux</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Well, I thought we had addressed all of our issues related to the initial change of <a target="_blank" href="http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/dst.htm">Daylight Savings Time (DST)</a> back in 2007.&nbsp; Server and Client operating systems were patched; so were messaging environments and&nbsp;anything supporting <a target="_blank" href="http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid7_gci283988,00.html">Network Time Protocol (NTP)</a> was looked reviewed.&nbsp; It was even necessary to make some changes to systems that synchronize e-mail to mobile handsets such as RIM&#39;s <a target="_blank" href="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/server/">BlackBerry Enterprise Server </a>or Motorola&#39;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.good.com/corp/int_products.php?id=33">Good Mobile Messaging</a> and patch the handsets themselves.<img vspace="10" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/DST2008-thumb.jpg" hspace="10" alt="DST2008.jpg" height="141" style="width: 200px; height: 141px" title="DST2008.jpg" /></p><p>Preparing for DST three weeks early and one week later seemed almost <span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana">reminiscent </span>of the buildup to Y2K.&nbsp; We didn&#39;t experience too many glitches other than known problems with Outlook calendars and I thought we would be set after making it through 2007.&nbsp; Low and behold, DST part deux has come along and flummoxed quite a few folks.</p>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/daylight_savings_time_part_deu.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/daylight_savings_time_part_deu.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/daylight_savings_time_part_deu.html</guid>
<category>Software</category><category>Daylight Savings Time</category><category>DST</category><category>Time Change</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:12:23 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Storage Failures:  Are Disks Really to Blame?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to hardware failures in PCs,&nbsp;servers or storage arrays, I&#39;ve always operated with the knowledge that any component with moving parts is the component most likely to fail and the faster the component moves, the lesser the mean time between failure and more likely that it will fail.&nbsp; That said,&nbsp;it&#39;s no revelation that hard drives,&nbsp;spinning at speeds of&nbsp;5400, 7200 or&nbsp;10000 RPM, are going to fail; which is why&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid5_gci214332,00.html">RAID</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid5_gci1283078,00.html">global hot spare drives</a>&nbsp;should always be used to automatically respond to a failure and prevent the loss of data.<img vspace="10" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/SAN-thumb.gif" hspace="10" alt="SAN.gif" height="183" style="width: 200px; height: 183px" title="SAN.gif" /></p><p>Increasing the availability of a&nbsp;storage array usually includes providing other redundant components such as controllers, fans, physical data paths, power supplies, etc., but again the disks were always assumed to be the most prone to failure.&nbsp; Well, I just finished reading an article in The Register titled &quot;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/06/disk_dominant_contributor_storage_paper/">You don&#39;t know disk about storage failures</a>&quot; that discussed a report compiled by the University of Illinois Department of Computer Science and Network Appliance illustrating that while disk failure&nbsp;contributes to&nbsp;the majority&nbsp;of storage subsystem failures, other hardware/software should not be ignored when purchasing a storage array.</p>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/storage_failures_are_disks_rea.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/storage_failures_are_disks_rea.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/storage_failures_are_disks_rea.html</guid>
<category>storage</category><category>Failure</category><category>RAID</category><category>Redundancy</category><category>Subsystem</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:40:29 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Threat Thursday:  U.S. Air Force&apos;s Cyber Command</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago I read an article in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.popsci.com/">Popular Science</a> that discussed the creation of a team within the military devoted to guarding against and responding to cyber attacks.&nbsp; At the time, we were just starting to see intrusions and data breaches so sophisticated that there was a lot of talk about state-sponsored hacking similar to state-sponsored terrorism.&nbsp; What really&nbsp;caught my attention in the article was that protection and detection weren&#39;t the only focus; countermeasures and response tactics were being hinted at.<img vspace="10" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/USAF-CC-thumb.jpg" hspace="10" alt="USAF-CC.jpg" height="141" style="width: 200px; height: 141px" title="USAF-CC.jpg" /></p><p>Well, according to a recent <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/05/air_force_cyber_command/">article</a> on The Register, the U.S. Air Force has a new <a target="_blank" href="http://www.afcyber.af.mil/">Cyber Command</a> which is scheduled to be operational in October and they&#39;ve just released their strategic vision for the new unit:</p><blockquote><p>&quot;Controlling cyberspace is the prerequisite to effective operations across all strategic and operational domains--securing freedom from attack and freedom to attack.&nbsp; We will develop and implement plans for maturing and expanding cyberspace operations as an Air Force core competency.&nbsp; We will provide decision makers with flexible options to deter, deny, disrupt, deceive, dissuade, and defeat adversaries through a variety of destructive and non-destructive, and lethal and non-lethal means.&nbsp; Finally, we will do this in friendly cooperation with our professional partners and teammates in other major commands, Services, combatant commands, and U.S. government agencies.&quot;</p></blockquote>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/threat_thursday_us_air_forces.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/threat_thursday_us_air_forces.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/threat_thursday_us_air_forces.html</guid>
<category>Security</category><category>Cyberwar</category><category>Electronic Warfare</category><category>Information Warfare</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:46:54 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Novell Acquires PlateSpin</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This is old news from the end of February, but I&#39;ve only just gotten around to dropping a post on it.&nbsp; <a target="_blank" href="http://www.novell.com/home/index.html">Novell Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=NOVL">NOVL</a>) has acquired <a target="_blank" href="http://www.platespin.com/">PlateSpin Ltd.</a>, a leader in server virtualization and data center management tools.&nbsp; Novell, best known for the NetWare operating system and top-of-line directory service has lost a lot of traction in the data center to the arguably inferior Windows operating system, as well as UNIX &amp; LINUX and they&#39;ve been flying under the radar (at least my radar) for quite a while now.<img vspace="10" align="right" width="250" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/novel-inside-thumb.png" hspace="10" alt="novel-inside.png" height="92" style="width: 250px; height: 92px" title="novel-inside.png" /></p><p>I think this is a great move by Novell to&nbsp;make a splash in the virtualization arena&nbsp;because PlateSpin has a few great <a target="_blank" href="http://www.platespin.com/products/">products</a> out there:</p><ul><li><em>Forge</em> is an appliance solution (think hotsite in a box) that provides complete protection for up to 25 server workloads straight out of the box.&nbsp; In the event of production server downtime or a disaster, protected workloads can be rapidly recovered and continue to run on the PlateSpin Forge appliance until they can be restored to the production environment.</li><li><em>PowerConvert</em> provides the&nbsp;flexibility to move and rebalance workloads in any direction between physical and virtual hosts.</li><li><em>PowerRecon</em> is a feature-rich analysis tool that can identify targets for consolidation or virtualization and you can convert IT resource usage data into billable values for chargeback purposes.</li></ul>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/novell_acquires_platespin.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/novell_acquires_platespin.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/03/novell_acquires_platespin.html</guid>
<category>Virtualization</category><category>Acquisition</category><category>Novell</category><category>PlateSpin</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 08:41:41 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Enormous Ad Revenue Potential for Google Health</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>About a week ago I posted <a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/google_storing_medical_records.html">Google Storing Medical Records</a>&nbsp;and discussed this emerging service.&nbsp; At the time I was concerned that the medical information <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/">Google</a> is storing would not be governed by the same <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/">HIPAA</a> regulations that ensure the privacy of this data.&nbsp; I was also concerned&nbsp;that Google could sell this data to biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies who would then use it for direct marketing purposes.<img vspace="10" align="right" width="150" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/GoogleHQ-thumb.jpg" hspace="10" alt="GoogleHQ.jpg" height="97" style="width: 150px; height: 97px" title="GoogleHQ.jpg" /></p><p>One key source of&nbsp;revenue that I completely forgot&nbsp;is ad revenue and now I&#39;ve just read a <a target="_blank" href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/29/the-goldmine-in-ads-that-arent-on-google-health/index.html?ref=technology">post</a> on the Bits blog in the technology section of the New York Times that reminded me of this potential gold mine.&nbsp; Google&#39;s chief executive, Eric Schmidt, stated that &quot;at first there would be no ads on the service&quot;, but a Google spokesman also stated that &quot;the company may well put ads on future versions of the service&quot;.</p>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/enormous_ad_revenue_potential.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/enormous_ad_revenue_potential.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/enormous_ad_revenue_potential.html</guid>
<category>Business</category><category>Advertising</category><category>Google</category><category>Google Health</category><category>Online</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:03:17 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Threat Thursday:  VMware&apos;s Vulnerability</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If you&#39;ve read my biography and some of my posts, you&#39;ll know that I&#39;m an almost rabid proponent of server virtualization and since I cut my teeth on VMware <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/vi/esx/" target="_blank">ESX Server</a>, I&#39;m a huge fan of their products.&nbsp; I like to know that I&#39;m getting the most out of my expensive, high-performance hardware and virtualization allows me to do just that.<img src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/vmware-thumb.png" alt="vmware.png" style="width: 150px; height: 69px" title="vmware.png" align="right" height="69" hspace="10" vspace="10" width="150" /></p><p>Another important aspect to virtualization is the level of isolation and security provided to the <a href="http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid94_gci213305,00.html#" target="_blank">virtual machine</a> (VM) and the server or desktop hosting those VMs.&nbsp; This helps to ensure that a misbehaving application won&#39;t adversely affect the function of the VMs operating alongside it or the underlying host.</p><p>In recent years this feature has provide protection for end-users by allowing them to use <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/desktop_virtualization.html" target="_blank">VMware Player or Workstation</a> to create a VM on their desktop that is solely dedicated for use when accessing the Internet.&nbsp; Should the VM ever become subject to a virus, spyware or&nbsp;other malware; rather than trying to extricate the malware (sometimes almost impossible), the user&nbsp;could dispose of the infected VM and deploy a fresh one.</p>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/threat_thursday_vmwares_vulner.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/threat_thursday_vmwares_vulner.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/threat_thursday_vmwares_vulner.html</guid>
<category>Security</category><category>Exploit</category><category>Virtualization</category><category>VMware</category><category>Vulnerability</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:02:37 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Don&apos;t Mess with Texas Advanced Computer Center (TACC)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Last December I posted <a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2007/12/where_in_the_world_is_amds_bar.html">Where In The World Is AMD&#39;s Barcelona?</a>&nbsp;to highlight the supply problems AMD was experiencing in delivering their quad-core processor to the marketplace.&nbsp; One of the main reasons for the shortage is that most of the available processors were being shipped to directly to Texas to be installed in a high-performance computing (HPC) system called <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/resources/hpcsystems/">Ranger</a>, which&nbsp;was expected to become the fastest supercomputer in the world with a peak performance of 504 <a target="_blank" href="http://searchcio-midmarket.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid183_gci213119,00.html">teraflops</a>&nbsp;when it entered service on February 4th.<img vspace="10" align="right" width="150" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/ranger2b-thumb.jpg" hspace="10" alt="ranger2b.jpg" height="100" style="width: 150px; height: 100px" title="ranger2b.jpg" /></p><p>There were several delays, not all attributed to AMD, and after IBM recently updated their HPC system (<a target="_blank" href="http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/deepcomputing/bluegene/bg_movie_flat.html">Blue Gene</a>) to support a peak performance of 596 teraflops; the Texas Advanced Computer Center (TACC) can only claim Ranger as the fastest &quot;open system&quot; HPC in the world.&nbsp; Ranger is the largest computing system in the world for open science research.</p>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/dont_mess_with_texas_advanced.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/dont_mess_with_texas_advanced.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/dont_mess_with_texas_advanced.html</guid>
<category>Hardware</category><category>AMD</category><category>Barcelona</category><category>HPC</category><category>Quad-Core</category><category>Supercomputer</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:15:30 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>MetaRAM Out of Stealth Mode</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I had been hearing a lot about <a target="_blank" href="http://www.metaram.com/">MetaRAM</a> now that they&#39;ve&nbsp;de-cloaked.&nbsp; This company managed to make quite a splash with articles on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.informationweek.com/research/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=JIT5HIB02TKCAQSNDLRCKH0CJUNN2JVN?articleID=206900369">Information Week</a> and other publications.&nbsp; Here&#39;s an opening blurb from their press release today:<img vspace="10" align="right" width="150" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/MetaRAM-thumb.gif" hspace="10" alt="MetaRAM.gif" height="133" style="width: 150px; height: 133px" title="MetaRAM.gif" /></p><blockquote><p>&quot;MetaRAM, a fabless semiconductor company focused on improving memory performance, today announced the launch of DDR2 MetaSDRAM&trade;, a new memory technology that significantly increases server and workstation performance while dramatically decreasing the cost of high-performance systems.&nbsp; Using MetaRAM&rsquo;s DDR2 MetaSDRAM, a quarter-terabyte, four-processor server with 16 cores starts at under $50,000, up to a 90 percent reduction in system cost &ndash; all without any system modifications.</p><p>MetaSDRAM, designed for AMD Opteron and Intel Xeon-based systems, is currently available in R-DIMMs from Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. and SMART Modular Technologies.&nbsp; Servers and workstations from Appro, Colfax International, Rackable Systems and Verari Systems are expected in the first quarter of 2008.&quot;</p></blockquote>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/metaram_out_of_stealth_mode.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/metaram_out_of_stealth_mode.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/metaram_out_of_stealth_mode.html</guid>
<category>Hardware</category><category>Memory</category><category>MetaRAM</category><category>MetaSDRAM</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:41:50 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Google Storing Medical Records</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Michael Liedtke of the Associated Press <a target="_blank" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080221/ap_on_hi_te/google_health;_ylt=At14tQtgSGPCNZjmghox8n.s0NUE">reports</a> that Google will launch their long-awaited health service by storing the medical records for several thousand patients:<img vspace="10" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/google_health-thumb.jpg" hspace="10" alt="google_health.jpg" height="100" style="width: 200px; height: 100px" title="google_health.jpg" /></p><blockquote><p>&quot;The pilot project ... will involve 1,500 to 10,000 patients at the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.clevelandclinic.org/default.aspx">Cleveland Clinic</a> who volunteered to an electronic transfer of their personal health records so they can be retrieved through <span style="background: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; cursor: hand; border-bottom: #0066cc 1px dashed" id="lw_1203600233_1" class="yshortcuts">Google</span>&#39;s new service, which won&#39;t be open to the general public.</p><p>Each health profile, including information about prescriptions, allergies and medical histories, will be protected by a password that&#39;s also required to use other Google services such as e-mail and personalized search tools.</p><p>Google views its expansion into health records management as a logical extension because its search engine already processes millions of requests from people trying to find about more information about an injury, illness or recommended treatment.&quot;</p></blockquote><p>The Cleveland Clinic already stores the health records of more than 120,000 patients on its own online service called <a target="_blank" href="https://mychart.clevelandclinic.org/default.asp">MyChart</a>, but patients will have the opportunity to transfer the information to Google so their records are readily accessible.</p>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/google_storing_medical_records.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/google_storing_medical_records.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/google_storing_medical_records.html</guid>
<category>Business</category><category>Data</category><category>Google</category><category>Health</category><category>HIPPA</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:22:05 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Threat Thursday:  Mobile Spam</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can&#39;t say I was surprised to read an <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/12/mobile_spam_deluge/">article</a> on The Register that we may soon be seeing a surge in the amount of spam delivered to our mobile phones.&nbsp; I actually just received my first bit of spam courtesy of Verizon Wireless last week and was still as uninterested in male enhancement or becoming immediately wealthy as when I get these messages on my personal or business e-mail.<img vspace="10" align="right" width="150" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/spamphone-thumb.jpg" hspace="10" alt="spamphone.jpg" height="93" style="width: 150px; height: 93px" title="spamphone.jpg" /></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.cloudmark.com/">Cloudmark</a>, a provider in the emerging mobile security space, has stated that&nbsp;&quot;text messaging via the internet provides a cost-effective platform for spammers to reach mobile subscribers.&nbsp; While numerically insignificant targets in the past, emails associated with mobile numbers are now showing up on the radar of spammers and phishers.&quot;</p>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/threat_thursday_mobile_spam.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/threat_thursday_mobile_spam.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/threat_thursday_mobile_spam.html</guid>
<category>Security</category><category>Cell Phones</category><category>Mobile</category><category>Spam</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:35:56 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Unisys Reinvented?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>One thing I love about The Register is how brash they can be in their reporting, but since they&#39;re English I&#39;ll use the word &quot;cheeky&quot;.&nbsp; While they don&#39;t denounce everyone &amp; everything, they are brutally honest and I find that very&nbsp;refreshing.&nbsp; Anyway, they have an article titled&nbsp;&quot;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/20/unisys_realtime/">Some firm named Unisys does something</a>&quot; that caught my eye because I got my private sector start in the Information Technology field with <a target="_blank" href="http://www.unisys.com/index.htm">Unisys Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=UIS">UIS</a>) 18 years ago as a contractor for the U.S. Coast Guard.<img vspace="10" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/rti_vid_icon-thumb.gif" hspace="10" alt="rti_vid_icon.gif" height="125" style="width: 200px; height: 125px" title="rti_vid_icon.gif" /></p><p>As mentioned in the article; Unisys was previously known for their large servers, used most often by the financial sector and government agencies, as well as for their services.&nbsp; Well, Unisys had difficulty competing when the low-cost, PC-based systems were welcomed into workplace and even after reinventing themselves as a service organization; they faced stiff competition in that overcrowded market.&nbsp; I&#39;m not trying to bash them, but I don&#39;t think they adapted quickly enough to accommodate their customers and they seem to be a shadow of the company they once were.</p>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/unisys_reinvented.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/unisys_reinvented.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/unisys_reinvented.html</guid>
<category>Business</category><category>Infrastructure</category><category>Services</category><category>Unisys</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:55:17 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>HP Faring Well in Hard Times</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><font face="verdana,geneva">Well, even though the president of the United States is claiming we&#39;re not yet in a recession; a lot of companies aren&#39;t performing so well, it appears layoffs are imminent&nbsp;and the stock markets have been more volatile than usual.&nbsp; It appears that </font><a target="_blank" href="http://www.hp.com/"><font face="verdana,geneva">HP</font></a><font face="verdana,geneva"> (NYSE: </font><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=hpq"><font face="verdana,geneva">HPQ</font></a><font face="verdana,geneva">) may be the only beacon in the gathering darkness.<img vspace="10" align="right" width="150" src="http://www.itechtips.com/uploads/HP_headquarters-thumb.jpg" hspace="10" alt="HP_headquarters.jpg" height="104" style="width: 150px; height: 104px" title="HP_headquarters.jpg" /></font></p><p><font face="verdana,geneva">HP </font><a target="_blank" href="http://h30261.www3.hp.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=71087&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1109844&amp;highlight="><font face="verdana,geneva">announced</font></a><font face="verdana,geneva"> their 1st fiscal quarter results for 2008 and with net revenue of $28.5 billion, up 13% from a year earlier and up 8% when adjusted for the effects of currency; they&#39;ve got a lot to be proud of, so I&#39;m sure Mark Hurd is getting his back slapped constantly:</font></p><blockquote><p><font face="verdana,geneva">&quot;In the first quarter, GAAP operating profit was $2.6 billion and GAAP diluted earnings per share (EPS) was $0.80, up from $0.55 in the prior-year period.&nbsp; Non-GAAP operating profit was $2.8 billion, with non-GAAP diluted EPS of $0.86 up from $0.65 in the prior-year period.&quot;</font></p></blockquote>]]><p><a href="http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/hp_faring_well_in_hard_times.html#more">Continue Reading</a></p>	</description>
         <link>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/hp_faring_well_in_hard_times.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.itechtips.com/2008/02/hp_faring_well_in_hard_times.html</guid>
<category>Business</category><category>FY08 Q02</category><category>HP</category><category>Performing</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:54:52 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
